The best move NATO could take right now is not admitting Ukraine as a new member, but instead Russia.
NATO should commit to never admitting Ukraine.
These moves would cement peace.
Unfortunately, the leadership in NATO sees Russia as an enemy. Pity.
The best move NATO could take right now is not admitting Ukraine as a new member, but instead Russia.
NATO should commit to never admitting Ukraine.
These moves would cement peace.
Unfortunately, the leadership in NATO sees Russia as an enemy. Pity.
There should be a presidential election in Ukraine to see if the country still supports this proxy war against Russia.
During the American Civil War, in 1864 there was still a presidential election with Lincoln pitted against the peace candidate McClelland. Lincoln won and the war continued, but I don’t think that would be the case in Ukraine.
I think the Ukranian people have a right to say whether they want the proxy war against Russia to continue. Americans were given that right in 1864, even at the height of our civil war. That’s called democracy.
The aggressor with regard to the Ukraine proxy war isn’t Russia, but US/NATO. Russia is just defending itself against this stealth invasion by Europe.
If anything, we owe Putin a debt of gratitude for the restraint he has shown. Otherwise, we would all be in basements waiting for the missiles to fall.
This proxy war is just more insane and counterproductive US foreign policy. After Iraq and Vietnam, I guess we should expect this — foreign policy that makes no sense and that is not in our interest.
Have any of all the wars produced anything good? Yet mankind is addicted to war.
Remarkable, that the market seems to be totally ignoring the threat of escalation in the Ukraine situation with the firing of missiles into Russia. You would think the market would be plunging, but instead it is going back to the previous high — completely ignoring the situation. I don’t get it. I really don’t understand such complacency.
Must be the notion, which is very false in my opinion, that nuclear war can’t happen because it is too catastrophic.
Russia is the country that defeated Nazi Germany. Do you really think they will have a problem defeating an incredibly corrupt Ukraine?
Trouble is, war is a natural state for mankind. But it will be the end to mankind.
Gettysburg is full of ironies. The Union side was routed through the town on the first day of the battle July 1st, and driven to the hilltops into an extremely strong defensive position by pure chance — this position was an accident of their first day rout, not a conscious decision, and ultimately decided the course of the battle. The bayonet charge of the Mainers on Little Round Top was a desperate reaction to about to be routed by the Reb charge up the hill. Had the Union force been routed, most military historians think this defeat of the left flank of the Union army would have put it into a very difficult position, perhaps even collapse. But what must have happened was the Mainers, out of desperation, decided on the only strategy that might have worked — a fixed bayonet charge. It worked because the Rebs didn’t have repeater rifles but had to reload in a clumsy way so this meant that a bayonet charge was very viable. Image you are a Reb and the person next to you is skewed with a bayonet and your rifle has already been shot and needs to be reloaded in all that chaos, with the threat that you yourself with be stabbed as well — a terrible way to die, so you turn and run. As for the ultimate irony at Gettysburg, Lee was known for winning battles with flanking actions, but instead did a frontal attack on a very strongly defended Union center. This when both the Union right and left flanks were extremely weak and would have collapsed had Lee pursued his usual strategy by sending reinforcements to both flanks. The only explanation is that Lee felt he could take the center and thus pretty much end the war then and there — the Union forced to sue for peace. So he rolled the dice — and lost because of the accidental Union defensive position. The final irony is that if Lee had used his usual strategy of attacking at the flanks — with both Union flanks weak — he may well have had a victory to end the war successfully for the South. Lee was a West P:ointer and would have known about Hannibal’s strategy at Cannae, and how effective a flank attack can be. But despite this knowledge, he did a frontal attack against a heavily fortified and very defensible Union center on a hilltop — why? We will never know.
Praise for those Americans who sacrificed their lives in war, but distain for a US government that has initiated so many ill-conceived and foolish wars.
The massive spending of the government on the Ukrainian war is just providing huge wealth to the military/industrial complex.
That segment of our economy was a key component before the Ukrainian war, but is becoming an even more dominant segment, which means our economy needs war to prosper.
Eisenhower will be rolling over in his grave.