Bioavailability

When we talk about protein, we often assume that 20 grams of protein is simply 20 grams of protein. But there is another consideration that is sometimes overlooked: bioavailability.

Bioavailability refers, among other things, to how much of the protein we eat is actually digested and absorbed by the body.

Protein from meat, fish, eggs, and dairy is generally highly digestible. Most of the protein is readily broken down during digestion and made available for absorption. Plant proteins, particularly those contained within intact foods such as beans, lentils, grains, nuts, and seeds, tend to be somewhat less digestible.

This doesn’t mean that plant protein is poorly absorbed. Far from it. Beans, lentils, soy, and other plant foods can make substantial contributions to our protein intake. But plant cell structures and naturally occurring compounds such as fiber and phytates can make some of their protein less accessible to digestive enzymes. Cooking and processing can substantially improve digestibility.

This raises an interesting practical question: If someone gets all of their protein from plant foods, should they simply assume that the number on the nutrition label represents the same amount of usable protein they would get from meat?

I don’t think that’s the best assumption.

A little animal protein can make things easier

For someone eating a predominantly plant-based diet, including a moderate amount of highly digestible animal protein can be a nutritional advantage.

For example, a diet might contain protein from beans, lentils, whole grains, nuts, and seeds, while also including some fish, eggs, poultry, or lean meat. The plant foods provide valuable fiber, vitamins, minerals, and other beneficial compounds, while the animal foods provide a concentrated source of highly digestible protein.

This can be particularly useful for older adults, who have a greater need to pay attention to maintaining muscle mass while often eating less food overall.

The point isn’t that plant protein is bad or that everyone needs to eat meat. A well-planned plant-based diet can provide adequate protein. Rather, there is little reason to make protein unnecessarily difficult to obtain by insisting that every gram come from plants.

Don’t overcorrect

At the same time, I wouldn’t recommend trying to calculate a precise “usable protein” number for every food.

Digestibility varies considerably among plant foods. Cooked beans aren’t the same as raw legumes. Tofu isn’t the same as a whole soybean. A plant-protein isolate isn’t the same as a grain. And a mixed diet makes the calculation even more complicated.

So I wouldn’t tell someone that they need to eat 25% more protein simply because their protein comes from plants.

A better approach is to eat sufficient total protein and obtain it from a variety of sources, including protein-rich plant foods and, if desired, moderate amounts of highly digestible animal protein.

The bottom line

Plant protein absolutely counts. But protein quantity isn’t the whole story.

The body has to digest and absorb the protein before it can use it, and animal proteins generally have an advantage in digestibility. For someone eating a primarily plant-based diet, including some highly digestible animal protein can therefore be a simple way to make meeting protein needs easier—particularly when maintaining muscle is a priority.

You don’t have to choose between plant foods and animal foods. A combination can give you the advantages of both.

Tariffs

Trade Act of 1974 (Section 301)

Allows tariffs to respond to unfair trade practices.

I asked an AI website whether the prez has the authority to impose tariffs under the Constitution. It said this belonged to Congress, but Congress can delegate this right to the prez, and it did that in 1974 to respond to “unfair trade practices”. This is what Trump has been claiming all along.

Avoiding Nuclear War

Coffee

I do a very different coffee these days. I’m very focused on polyphenols and their benefits. Turns out that organic coffee that is lightly roasted has the most polyphenols. Organic because it won’t have toxins that non organic coffee contains. The more the coffee is roasted, the less polyphenols it contains. Dark roasted coffee will have little. So I go with light roasted to maximize the polyphenols.

I add to the coffee a teaspoon of pure cacao. Pure cacao is extremely high in polyphenols as well, and this has the advantage of creating a mocha like taste to the coffee.

I also add a teaspoon of turmeric to reduce inflammation as well as a teaspoon of creatine, which improves the efficiency of your mitochondria. And finally I add some Ceylon cinnamon powder for taste.

To the best of my calculation, this mixture is less than 10 calories, a pittance (so little to no impact on intermittent fasting), but incredibly high in those magic polyphenols. Polyphenols are beneficial to your microbiome, but due to hormesis, they are a major boost to your longevity/health.

Old Age

Russia’s Concern

Russia saved the world from the Nazis with Stalingrad — the true turning point in the war. The cost of World War 2 to Russia was 27 million dead. That’s MILLION.

It is not difficult to understand Russia’s concern about European expansionism and imperialism toward Russia. First there was Napoleon, then more aggression from Europe toward Russia in World War 1, and then Hitler and the Nazis and that huge loss in lives in the millions. Now we have NATO and the US waging a proxy war in Ukraine — a covert invasion of Russia.

In much the same way that the Cuban missile crisis was existential for the US, this proxy war in Ukraine is existential for Russia. Russia will not tolerate having American missiles in Ukraine, that close to their capitol — thus their point of view that Ukraine cannot be a member of NATO.

No way Russia will back down from this conflict without complete capitulation by Kiev. That’s the only deal out there acceptable to Putin.

Putin’s Restraint

Color

I’ve noticed that a person’s color preferences are heavily influenced by their hair color.

For instance, blondes have a natural inclination toward blue, while red heads (who often really have orange hair, although a minority have actual red hair) have a natural inclination toward brown.

Poison?