A Sail Away Adventure

Catboat Reflection

I was only 15 years old but adventurous — what 15-year old isn’t?  We were all sailors.  Twice a week, on Tuesdays and Thursdays, the yacht club would hold races for a fleet of Beetlecats to go round buoys on Waquoit Bay on Cape Cod — a large, 3-by-1 mile bay that lets out through a rocky jetty to Vineyard Sound.  I say “we” because my buddy, Jimmy Johnson, used to crew for me in those races.  We were a team.

That bay, though large, was extremely safe, as there were few locations on the bay that were deep, and all locations were very visible to the surrounding houses, but mostly because it wasn’t the real ocean — which lay just beyond the rocky jetty.  The ocean was where unpredictable and potentially dangerous things happened, but the bay was “safe” or so it seemed.

I got the idea one day that it would be fun to sail across the sound and go to Martha’s Vineyard, where I had never been.  Jim liked the idea, too.  So the next stop were the parents.  Would they say yes?

Now there must be few decisions more daunting than to ask parents to put their children in harm’s way.  The easy answer is simply to say no and be done with it — to keep them safe.  But is there not some harm in forever saying no because it leads to far less experience for the adolescent as well as stunted initiative, which, one would think, parents want to encourage?  So it is not necessarily an easy decision.  Perhaps because the two of us were such seasoned sailors — even at that young age we had years of experience sailing — the decision, a bit to our surprise, came down in the affirmative.

We didn’t go off half cocked.  First thing was to get two sleeping bags so that we could sleep on the boat comfortably.  Then we needed a compass — all sailors know to always bring a compass.  That’s second nature, an iron-clad rule.  Finally we needed a solid 3-day stretch of good weather — we did not want to sleep out in the open in the rain.  The very next weekend, everything fell into place, including the weather.

The morning we lit out, there was a steady but not overwhelming breeze, which was encouraging — the “chop” on the sound would not be that formidable.  But we had a challenge right off the bat.  The wind was blowing straight in on the narrow channel made by the jetty — a narrow channel in between two lines of rocks that extended pretty far out into the sound.   The two lines of rocks were necessary to protect the dredged channel from the shifting sands near the beaches.  Having to sail up wind in that narrow a channel meant that we had to make a series of quick tacks to make any headway, and it was perilous to come anywhere near the rocks on either side because you did not know how far out these jagged ship-wreckers extended under water.   But we finally made it through the narrow channel, and broke free of the jetty out into the open water.  At that point, we put on life preservers — one of the requirements that we had promised to live up to if we were allowed to make this voyage.

From where we were, I could make out approximately the locations of East Chop and West Chop on Martha’s Vineyard, and took a reading on the compass, so that I would know the compass direction to our destination.  But what I saw was a little unnerving.  A fog bank had come in on the island so that you could still see the land, the dark outline of the land, but you could no longer see any detail, and even the outline of the land was getting less and less distinct, as we sailed on in an easy reach, across the wind, toward the island.   Only about a third of the way across Vineyard Sound, the fog bank came in hard and enveloped our little Beetlecat.  You could barely see 50 feet in any direction.  I was confident, though, because I had the compass reading and so knew our direction despite the thick, pea-soup fog.  I knew we were still on course.

Perhaps overconfident is the right word, for that is when terror struck.  It was a truly gigantic blast of a fog horn that seemed to be right on top of us, even though we could not see anything.  We both knew instantly what it was — the big Nantucket Ferry, and we both knew it was extremely close, given the magnitude of the deafening blast.   It was a moment of abject fear, for had the ferry run into us, it would have crushed the little sailboat and, no doubt, pulled the two of us as well as the sailboat underneath its hull and toward the blades — in other words, almost certain death.  And even if we had been able to escape to the surface, they would have never found us in the fog.

I had a small canister fog horn of my own, and let out my own wee blast, but did it almost simultaneously with a second blast by the ferry, but this second blast was already past us — so we had survived a potential collision.  But that’s when the huge wake from the ferry hit the Beetlecat broadside.

Sailboats are really designed for the type of water they are meant to sail on.  Out on the ocean, you really want a boat with a deep, built-in keel that can stand up to a severe wind and a deep “chop,”  and you want a boat with high topsides, that space from the waterline to the deck, so that water has a pretty decent climb before it can get inside the boat.  The Beetlecat has neither.  It has a skimpy little centerboard, not a keel, and very low topsides, so it sits very low in the water and can be easily swamped.  To make matters worse, the boat also has a wide beam for its length, so it is designed almost like a a bucket, ready to be filled with water.   This is not a problem when you are sailing on shallow bays, but, let’s just say, it is less than ideal on the ocean.

Swamping was the real risk with such a huge wake from the massive ferry.  With a wake like that hitting the boat broadside, the Beetlecat goes up, sideways, on one side of the wave, reaches the top, and then slides down hard, sideways, on the other side of the wave, and so now the tilted boat kind of spears down into the gully made by the wave.  When the side of the boat speared into the water, the water shot up over the low topsides, flooded onto the narrow desk, and spilled ever so slightly over the very top of a 4-inch railing that was the last barrier to flooding the boat.  So we were just a few inches away from disaster — of being swamped in a bucket of a boat in the middle of Vineyard Sound in the fog.  But a few inches were as good as a mile.

We never even considered turning around and going back — not for one second.  For one thing, we were as close to the island as we were to the mainland, and I still had a fix on the right compass direction, so we just kept going.  And just as suddenly as the fog bank had come upon us, it started to dissolve, and so in a short amount of time, we began to see that thin outline of land that was Martha’s Vineyard dead ahead.  We hit East Chop and West Chop straight on; sailed into the inner harbor; took out the small anchor we had stowed away for the trip; and made sure it had a snug grip on the bottom to hold the boat in place.  We had made it!

The island was ours for the taking.  We rented bikes.  Need I say more — two boys with complete license to explore an enchanted island with new discoveries at every bend in the road.  We left no rock unturned, no corner of that island unseen, no small community untapped — and no ice cream parlor unmolested.  We saw it all, top to bottom and inside out.  But what a huge surprise lay in wait for us that very first night, that was just as unexpected — but in a good way — as that menacing ferry had been in a bad way.

When the twilight came on that first evening, we found ourselves, by chance, walking around Oak Bluffs.  How should I describe the unique experience that surprised the bejesus out of us there?  About the only thing that comes anywhere near the magic we experienced that night is the scene in the Wizard of Oz when Dorothy, after surviving the tornado (like we survived the ferry), suddenly arrives in Munchkin Land, for we had walked into a true faeryland of our own, called by the natives of Martha’s Vineyard “Illumination Night.”

Just imagine these little gingerbread cottages, each with extraordinary whimsical designs, lined up close together on narrow lanes, and decorated with strings of the most extravagant and huge illuminated lanterns.  It was a true faeryland, but we were not dreaming — it was real, and we were there to see it.  It was literally like you didn’t really believe your own eyes — that level of incredulity.

The sail back to the mainland was a snap — downwind all the way on a steady breeze.  What could be easier?  And with a straight shot through the jetty, we were back into the  “safe” waters of Waquoit Bay lickety-split.  The parents were all happy — and relieved — to see us pull up to the mooring and come ashore.  They had taken a chance on us and let us go on our adventure.  Looking back on it, I would say, yes, there was risk, even fatal risk, in the offing, but there was also magic — such is life.

Waquoit Bay

Beetlecats

Martha’s Vineyard

Nantucket Ferry

Munchkin Land

Illumination Night on Martha’s Vineyard

My Story

What do you get for a one dollar contribution? My gratitude.

If you enjoyed the post, you can help me keeping blogging along with just a one dollar contribution. You can contribute more by increasing the quantity — each increase by 1 is an additional dollar. Thanks for your support in this blog-eat-blog world.

$1.00

Nuclear Winter

Henry Barnard's avatarHenry's Views

68_Statue silhouette black flat

The New START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) was signed in 2011, replacing START 1, and runs until 2021.  It limits the number of warheads of the US and Russia to 1550 each. It’s interesting to try to imagine what the United States would turn into if 1550 nuclear warheads were to hit their target here.  These modern warheads are not comparable to the two nuclear bombs dropped in WW2, which are puny in comparison.  The modern warheads are much more powerful – some, for instance, more than 3000 times the explosive capacity of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.

Major targets are assumed to be hit with not just one but multiple warheads to ensure that at least one warhead gets through.  So it is safe to assume that all major cities would simply be obliterated, given the magnitude of these weapons, leaving intense radiation in the surrounding area.  Most of…

View original post 564 more words

Lightening Bold, RCA Building

lighteningboldrcabuilding

Manhattan, A Photographer’s Journey by Henry Barnard

My Story

What do you get for a one dollar contribution? My gratitude.

If you enjoyed the post, you can help me keeping blogging along with just a one dollar contribution. You can contribute more by increasing the quantity — each increase by 1 is an additional dollar. Thanks for your support in this blog-eat-blog world.

$1.00

The Brightest Star in the Night Sky

Before and after thee, an infinity.
Life but a momentary thing
That dissolves in eternity.
Applause and glory, misbegotten,
Your memory long forgotten.

The directing mind alone a divinity.
The body a loathsome encumbrance.
To benefit others the nitty-gritty —
Everything else a wide circumference.

Dedicate your life to others, the mantra.
Dismiss pleasure and pain, a recanter.
Come back to the inner mind, a sanctuary.
Remember the one purpose eleemosynary.

He wrote to himself not to forget,
Keep to the singular purpose dead set.
The brightest star in the night sky, Sirius,
That’s the immortal Marcus Aurelius.

All poetry — Henry Barnard

My Story

 

What do you get for a one dollar contribution? My gratitude.

If you enjoyed the post, you can help me keeping blogging along with just a one dollar contribution. You can contribute more by increasing the quantity — each increase by 1 is an additional dollar. Thanks for your support in this blog-eat-blog world.

$1.00

Christ and Bombs, East Village Window Painting

Christ and Bombs, Door Graffiti

Manhattan, A Photographer’s Journey by Henry Barnard

My Story

What do you get for a one dollar contribution? My gratitude.

If you enjoyed the post, you can help me keeping blogging along with just a one dollar contribution. You can contribute more by increasing the quantity — each increase by 1 is an additional dollar. Thanks for your support in this blog-eat-blog world.

$1.00

Stoicism

Hamlet was just reiterating what ancient Greek and Roman Stoic philosophers knew about values and one’s own thinking when he remarked: “…for there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.”  Simply put, one’s thinking is the prism through which one sees the world.

Hamlet’s clever remark is actually one of the bedrocks of the Stoic tradition — that one’s mind controls one’s values, not the other way around.  So that a person’s reactions to the world, to external events, are to a large extent controlled by one’s preconceptions, attitudes, judgments.  But these preconceptions, attitudes, judgments are malleable — you formed them but you can also alter them.  So this line of thinking leads naturally to a mind over matter discipline that the Stoics employed to free themselves from views of the world that were, in their view, not rational and so counterproductive for living a truly virtuous life.

But where — or when — did this line of thinking among the Stoics actually begin?.  Most scholars place the beginning of Stoicism itself with Zeno of Citium in the early 3rd century B.C.  However, this perspective does not emerge with Zeno or his direct disciples who came to be known as “Stoics”.

However, this perspective is widely seen in later Stoics.  For instance, in the late 1st century and early 2nd century A.D., Epictetus asserted: “Man is affected, not by events, but by the view he takes of them” or “Remember, it is not enough to be hit or insulted to be harmed, you must believe that you are being harmed.  If someone succeeds in provoking you, realize that your mind is complicit in the provocation.”  In other words, that belief is a necessary prerequisite for the harm, so if there is no such belief, there is no harm — even if hit or insulted.  In other words, you have to believe that you have been insulted to be insulted.

Perhaps the clearest explanation of this principle is by Marcus Aurelius who wrote in the 2nd century A.D.: “If you are pained by any external thing, it is not this thing that disturbs you, but your own judgment about it.  And it is in your power to wipe out this judgment now.”  In effect, no judgment means no pain — despite the existence of “any external thing.”

Marcus Aurelius might also point us in the right direction to the true originator of this central Stoic concept of the pivotal role that the mind plays in reacting to external reality.  In his book Meditations, he wrote: ” ‘All is as thinking makes it so.’  The retort made to Monimus the Cynic is clear enough: but clear too is the value of his saying, if one takes the kernel of it, as far as it is true.”

So we have it, indirectly, from Marcus Aurelius that an early Stoic by the name of Monimus the Cynic could well be the originator of this gem of an idea that Stoicism latched onto.  But what was this “kernel of his saying,” which Monimus the Cynic must have made?  His brilliant assertion, summed up very tersely, was: “All is opinion.”  This was the revolutionary thought that established a very strong Stoic tradition of the power of one’s preconceptions, attitudes, judgments in shaping one’s response to the external world and external events — because these mental constructs are our own, they are subject to our will, and are therefore subject to whatever change we see fit to make of them.  There is a certain freedom granted to the individual by this perspective, as it provides license to reinvent oneself.

Monimus was saying that it’s all about opinion (i.e., preconceptions, attitudes, judgments), that virtually everything we encounter comes down to forming an opinion about it.  And so it becomes crucial to form more rational preconceptions, attitudes, judgments about the world, especially if one wants to live what was the ultimate ideal of the Stoics — the rational virtuous life.

This view of the role of the mind in interpreting the world could lead the Stoics to very different reactions to what they considered to be “natural” events in one’s life.  For instance, Marcus Aurelius believed that death was just a natural event in every man’s life, like eating or sleeping, etc., so to mourn someone’s death was the height of folly.  Rather, death should simply be accepted without much fanfare as an inevitable occurrence — accepted not with a great deal of emotion but passively and graciously and certainly not mourned.  So you can see how these types of altered Stoic reactions might well have been the result not of “toughing it out” — the popular conception of Stoicism — but rather of adopting an entirely different set of more rational preconceptions, attitudes, judgments, as per the insight originally provided by Monimus the Cynic.

Stoicism

My Story

What do you get for a one dollar contribution? My gratitude.

If you enjoyed the post, you can help me keeping blogging along with just a one dollar contribution. You can contribute more by increasing the quantity — each increase by 1 is an additional dollar. Thanks for your support in this blog-eat-blog world.

$1.00